SANTA MONICA, Calif. – This month’s new vehicle sales (including fleet sales) are expected to be 710,000 units, a 4.5 percent decrease from November 2008 and a 15.0 percent decrease from October 2009, according to Edmunds.com.

Edmunds.com analysts predict that November’s Seasonally Adjusted Annualized Rate (SAAR) will be 10.34 million, down from 10.43 in October 2009. November 2009 has 23 selling days, two less than last November. When adjusted for this difference, sales increased 3.8 percent from November 2008.

“November is living up to its reputation for being one of the worst months of the year for car sales, so everyone is hopeful that Thanksgiving weekend will boost the numbers,” said Edmunds.com Senior Analyst Jessica Caldwell. “But automakers have already launched holiday season incentives in order to pick up the pace, and that sense of desperation suggests that bigger discounts – but smaller selection – may be available for those who wait to buy.”

The combined monthly U.S. market share for Chrysler, Ford and General Motors (GM) domestic nameplates is estimated to be 46.4 percent in November 2009, down from 48.6 percent in November 2008 and up from 45.1 percent in October 2009.

Edmunds.com is also tracking the market share of 2009 and 2010 model year vehicles in autumn sales, and has found that there is remarkable disparity between automakers in terms of old model year inventory. For example, fewer than 42 percent of new vehicles sold by Chrysler, General Motors, Hyundai and Nissan in October were 2010 model year, but the industry average was 59 percent.

McLEAN, Va. — After a thorough review of the Cash for Clunkers program, the chief economist of the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), Paul Taylor, determined that the cost of each incremental vehicle sold was around $4,587. An incremental sale is a sale that would not otherwise have occurred without the Clunkers program.

His findings bring into serious question the methodology behind the $24,000 estimate promoted last week by the car-buying Website Edmunds.com.

“It’s really not that hard to determine a credible cost estimate for the Clunkers program,” says Taylor. “You subtract projected sales versus actual sales for July and August when the Clunkers program was operating, and divide the program’s $3 billion by that number.”

Taylor says that, based on sales volume for previous months, a realistic projection of auto sales for July and August would be around 1.6 million. Actual sales for those two months totaled 2,253,963. The difference is 653,963. That’s the number of incremental sales generated by the Clunkers program. Divide the program’s $3 billion by that number and you get $4,587, the average cost per incremental Clunker sale.

“The analysis by Edmunds.com is wrong on the two main points that it tries to make,” Taylor said. “First, because of its flawed methodology, the study can’t form the basis for measuring the program’s impact or costs. Secondly, and more importantly, the analysis clouds understanding and misleads rather than clarifies the true state of auto sales and the economy.”

Edmunds.com says it came up with its estimates by examining the sales trend for luxury vehicles and others not in Cash for Clunkers, and applying the historic relationship of those vehicles to total SAAR (Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate). Taylor says this method virtually assured that cost estimates would be “overstated and inflated.”

“Historically, over the past 20 years, auto sales have been lower in July and August than in June, in the absence of strong incentives. Edmunds ignores this,” Taylor said.

“The Dow Jones and broader market indexes made strong recoveries over the summer, assisting luxury light vehicle sales. But there is a fundamental difference between what drives luxury car sales and non-luxury sales,” Taylor added. “An improving stock market, for example, may boost luxury car sales but it has little effect on non-luxury sales. Job growth, income growth and housing affect non-luxury vehicle sales. And in each of those categories the numbers are not good. Unemployment is up. Income is down. And housing prices continued to fall through July. This has not been the kind of economic environment that encourages a purchase by the average car buyer.”